Indicators at the line hierarchy

If you are not interested in the territory-based evaluation of indicators, you can also carry out evaluations directly at the line hierarchy levels. For a PuT operator it is important, for example, to know how the volume/capacity ratio of its vehicles is along the course of the line routes. Based on this, the operator can decide to lengthen or shorten a line route. The Table 202 shows the beginning and the end of the line route course of line 002 and the saturation of seats between stops. Between Siemensallee and Lassallestraße, the average volume/capacity ratio is only 4 %, so that shortening the line may be a possibility.

Table 202: Analysis of the Vol/Cap ratio of seats on the line route level

Index

Line route name

Direction code

Node number

Stop point name

Vol/Cap ratio Seats [%]

1

2_H

>

105497581

Wolfartsweier Nord

8

2

2_H

>

105224474

 

8

3

2_H

>

105224473

 

8

4

2_H

>

105497580

Durlach Zündhütle

10

5

2_H

>

105497579

 

10

6

2_H

>

105226816

 

10

7

2_H

>

105226814

 

10

8

2_H

>

105226812

 

10

9

2_H

>

105222467

 

10

10

2_H

>

105497578

Aue Friedhof / Steiermärker Str.

11

...

...

...

...

...

...

106

2_H

>

100521

Kussmaulstr.

41

107

2_H

>

100522

Hertzstr.

26

108

2_H

>

100523

Feierabendweg

21

109

2_H

>

100524

Neureuter Str.

9

110

2_H

>

105496077

 

9

111

2_H

>

100525

Siemensallee

4

112

2_H

>

100526

Lassallestr.

0

The service kilometers are often taken into account for the distribution of the calculated operating costs between an infrastructural operator and the provider of the PuT supply. In this example, Line S3 uses the infrastructure of the Deutsche Bahn (German Rail). In the Lines list, the service kilometers can be displayed per line.

Table 203: Service kilometer analysis on the level of lines

Line name

Transport system

Service kilometers [km]

R92

TRAIN

243.612

S1

TRAM

2,468.828

S11

TRAM

1,080.146

S2

TRAM

3,273.128

S3

TRAM

835.176

S31

TRAM

577.254

S4

TRAM

2,129.673

S5

TRAM

4,074.132

S8

TRAIN

53.920

Visum supports you when making a decision on the line bundle to be run by a bus operator ("To which operator, which of the lines are allocated?"). For each line, typical indicators such as costs, total revenue, revenue per passenger trip, total cost coverage and cost coverage per passenger trip are calculated. The table shows the values for the analysis horizon of one year. Lines with a cost coverage deficit have a negative amount of coverage. In terms of balancing the high-profit lines and low-profit lines as fair as possible, this data can be used to form line bundles, for which PuT operators then can apply in the framework of a tender.

Line name

Transport system

Costs [CU]

Revenue total [CU]

Revenue PTrip [CU]

Cost cov. total [CU]

Cost cov. / PTrip [CU]

Cost cov. [%]

21

BUS

433,831.31

773,477.34

0.56

339,646.03

0.25

178.29

22

BUS

254,736.07

314,551.88

0.53

59,815.80

0.10

123.48

23

BUS

487,624.88

214,824.83

0.55

-272,800.05

-0.70

44.06

30

BUS

515,029.02

1,818,301.46

0.63

1,303,272.44

0.45

353.05

31

BUS

705,276.05

872,187.83

0.59

166,911.78

0.11

123.67

32

BUS

452,384.95

425,354.17

0.44

-27,030.78

-0.03

94.02

42

BUS

361,669.22

868,201.73

0.52

506,532.51

0.30

240.05

43

BUS

276,488.08

215,746.49

0.50

-60,741.59

-0.14

78.03

44

BUS

333,456.14

54,659.89

0.53

-278,796.26

-2.69

16.39

45

BUS

429,574.91

330,818.45

0.61

-98,756.46

-0.18

77.01

46

BUS

188,345.74

261,343.71

0.51

72,997.98

0.14

138.76

47

BUS

339,342.42

189,913.11

0.71

-149,429.31

-0.56

55.97

50

BUS

509,071.08

988,980.88

0.58

479,909.80

0.28

194.27

51

BUS

88,748.77

195,342.70

0.57

106,593.93

0.31

220.11

52

BUS

328,666.85

335,666.87

0.52

7,000.01

0.01

102.13

55

BUS

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

60

BUS

337,039.94

2,004,260.28

0.51

1,667,220.34

0.43

594.67

62

BUS

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

70

BUS

717,616.46

1,375,946.79

0.53

658,330.33

0.25

191.74

71

BUS

83,309.71

171,403.50

0.52

88,093.79

0.27

205.74

73

BUS

384,722.03

1,809,097.37

0.52

1,424,375.34

0.41

470.23

74

BUS

265,425.27

1,151,942.68

0.53

886,517.42

0.40

434.00

75

BUS

52,673.44

243,368.34

0.47

190,694.90

0.37

462.03

107

BUS

231,821.70

77,805.81

0.52

-154,015.89

-1.04

33.56

108

BUS

59,030.88

0.00

0.00

-59,030.88

0.00

0.00

123

BUS

397,079.54

40,164.47

0.99

-356,915.07

-8.76

10.11

151

BUS

216,990.34

41,625.77

25,569.00

-175,364.57

-7.16

19.18

222

BUS

244,624.05

23,291.90

2.16

-221,332.15

-20.56

9.52

551

BUS

142,190.73

306,929.17

0.59

164,738.44

0.32

215.86

Table 204: Cost and revenue computation on the level of lines