Introductory example of equilibrium assignment

The effectiveness of the equilibrium assignment is described in the example in Table 129 and Image 92. The example analyzes the relation between traffic zone "village A" and traffic zone "city X".

The total impedance of a route, for the sake of simplicity, results from the sum of link impedances of the route (Impact models). Impedances for connectors and turns are not considered in the route search. In detail, the following assumptions apply:

  • The impedance of the links is determined from the current travel time tCur. The current travel time tCur is in turn calculated using the capacity restraint function BPR with a=1, b=2 and c=1.
  • The access and egress times for the connectors are not considered, that is, they are set to 0 minutes.
  • Turn penalties are not considered.

With regard to the traffic demand the following applies.

  • The traffic demand between A-Village and X-City is 2,000 car trips during peak hour.
  • Capacity and demand refer to one hour.

The example network contains three routes which connect village A and city X.

  • Route 1 via nodes 10 – 11 – 41 – 40
  • Route 2 via nodes 10 – 11 – 20 – 21 – 30 – 31 – 40
  • Route 3 via nodes 10 – 12 – 21 – 30 – 31 – 40

Route 1 mainly uses country roads and is 26 km long. It is the shortest route. Route 2 is 30 km long. It is the fastest route because the federal road can be traversed at a speed of 100 km/h if there is free traffic flow.

Route 3 which is also 30 km long is an alternative route which only makes sense if the federal road is congested.

Image 92: Example network for equilibrium assignment

Table 129: Example network for equilibrium assignment

LinkNo

From Node

To Node

Type

Length [m]

Capacity [car units/h]

v0-PrT [km/h]

1

10

11

20 Federal road

5000

1200

100

2

11

20

20 Federal road

5000

1200

100

3

20

21

20 Federal road

5000

1200

100

4

20

40

90 Rail track

10000

0

0

5

21

30

20 Federal road

5000

1200

100

6

30

31

20 Federal road

5000

1200

100

7

31

40

20 Federal road

5000

1200

100

8

11

41

30 Country road

16000

800

80

9

40

41

30 Country road

5000

800

80

10

10

12

40 Other roads

10000

500

60

11

12

21

40 Other roads

5000

500

60

As a result, the assignment provides values of Table 130 for the three routes (PrT paths).

Table 130: Assignment results for the three PrT paths

Route

tCur

Impedance

Volume (AP)

1

46min 39s

2798

1157.488

2

46min 34s

2794

618.079

3

46min 12s

2772

224.432

The most important assignment results for links are displayed in Table 131.

Table 131: Assignment result at the links

Link

tCur

Impedance

Volume (AP)

Saturation PrT (AP)

VehicleHr(tCur)

VehKmTravelled PrT

1

11min 40s

700

1908

170

370h 54min 19s

9537.839

2

5min 47s

347

1157

96

111h 43min 15s

5787.442

3

5min 47s

347

1157

96

111h 43min 15s

5787.442

5

7min 48s

468

1450

126

188h 29min 38s

7249.603

6

7min 48s

468

1450

126

188h 29min 38s

7249.603

7

7min 48s

468

1450

126

188h 29min 38s

7249.603

8

26min 35s

1595

750

110

332h 23min 38s

12001.270

9

8min 19s

499

750

110

103h 52min 23s

3750.397

10

15min 12s

912

292

72

74h 3min 56s

2924.321

11

7min 36s

456

292

72

37h 1min 58s

1462.161